Decolonial Repair Network · Educational Guide

Active Objectors
to Empire

A guide for Quakers and allies who want to move from good intentions toward principled, material, and accountable solidarity with Indigenous peoples — rooted in the New Conscientious Objector (NewCO) Framework.
NewCO Framework Great Plains Action Society LANDBACK Mutual Aid Abolition Indigenous Futurism
Step 1 · Name the Problem

One Fused System of Violence

Christian Colonial Capitalist Violence is not three separate issues. It is a single, interlocking machine whose durability comes from the seamless integration of all three components. Any attempt to reform one component is destined to fail because the other two remain intact to regenerate the oppressive logic. Click each card to learn more.

Christian Component

Ideological Engine

Provided the "moral license for conquest" through the Doctrine of Discovery — 15th-century papal bulls absorbed directly into U.S. law.

+ Read more

The Doctrine of Discovery granted European Christian monarchs divine authority to "invade, search out, capture, vanquish, and subdue" any non-Christian peoples and seize their lands. This was absorbed into United States law in the 1823 Supreme Court case Johnson v. M'Intosh, legally nullifying Indigenous title and has been cited in federal Indian law as recently as 2005.

Quaker complicity: Under President Grant's "Quaker Policy" of 1869, Quakers operated approximately 30 of the 350+ Indian Boarding Schools. These schools were instruments of cultural genocide — suppressing languages, spiritualities, and family structures — however well-intentioned individual Quakers may have been.

Colonial Component

Political Project

Settler-colonialism aimed to permanently replace Indigenous populations through physical violence and cultural genocide — not just resource extraction.

+ Read more

The boarding school system — "Kill the Indian in him, and save the man" — was designed to assimilate Indigenous peoples out of existence. Children were forcibly removed from families, forbidden from speaking their languages, and subjected to widespread abuse. The intergenerational trauma from this system reverberates to this day.

Settler-colonialism is distinct from other forms of colonialism: its goal is not resource extraction alone but the permanent replacement of the original population. This requires the "elimination of the native" — a project that continues through legal, cultural, and economic means.

Capitalist Component

Economic Engine

White land theft, resource extraction, and the deliberate dismantling of traditional Indigenous economies to create permanent dependency.

+ Read more

The boarding school curriculum was not designed for intellectual development but for servitude: boys trained in manual trades, girls in domestic service — generations retrained for life at the bottom of the Euro-American economic ladder. This was economic warfare that destroyed sovereign Indigenous economies.

Iowa illustrates the ongoing capitalist component: it is the most biologically colonized state in the country, with the second highest rising cancer rate and the #1 contributor to the dead zone in the Gulf of Mexico — all driven by colonial-capitalist farming practices that replaced Indigenous land stewardship.

Systemic Blowback

The System Turns Inward

A system built on dispossession does not stop at its targets. Its logic turns inward, inflicting versions of its foundational violence on the dominant society — creating a self-perpetuating cycle that prevents the multiracial coalition that could challenge the root system.

Capitalist Blowback

The promise of prosperity to the white working class has been broken by deindustrialization and wage stagnation. "Deaths of despair" — suicide, drug and alcohol poisoning — have surged among non-college-educated white Americans. Note: Native American mortality rates from these causes remain the highest of any group.

Christian Blowback

White Christian Nationalism functions as a "maladaptive coping mechanism" — misdirecting legitimate economic anger away from the structural sources of suffering and toward racial and cultural scapegoats. Polling data shows a strong correlation between Christian Nationalist beliefs and support for political violence.

Colonial Blowback

The tools of colonial population control — military equipment, warrior mindsets — have been brought home through programs like the DoD's 1033 Program, which has transferred over $7.4 billion in surplus military equipment to local law enforcement since 1997. The public is made "less safe and less free."

Jeff Kisling's Emerging Framework

The New Conscientious Objector (NewCO)

Just as historic Quaker conscientious objectors refused military service on grounds of conscience, the NewCO framework calls us to refuse — actively, materially, spiritually — participation in systems of colonial capitalism. In 1969, Jeff Kisling refused the Vietnam War draft at Scattergood Friends School. He applies that same spiritual genealogy to the present crisis.

01

The Economic Draft

Colonial capitalism forces survival-level participation in unjust systems — a structural analogue to military conscription. Most people don't enthusiastically support extractive systems; they're conscripts. Mutual Aid provides the "rations" that make desertion possible.

02

Active Objection

Not passive refusal — but principled withdrawal of material support from colonial systems, and active redirection toward building the world that should exist. Active, embodied, costly. The standard of success is not how you feel about your growth — it's whether the conditions facing Indigenous peoples change.

03

Theological Translation

Using Quaker language, frameworks, and spiritual authority to communicate decolonial imperatives to that tradition's members. When Jeff Kisling writes an "Epistle on LANDBACK," he uses a Quaker form to carry concepts that might otherwise feel foreign into a frame Friends already inhabit. Bridge-building, not appropriation.

04

Prefigurative vs. Transformative

Prefigurative work (living differently) and transformative work (changing the conditions others live under) are not equivalent. A meeting that installs solar panels is doing prefigurative work. A meeting that campaigns to protect the Meskwaki Nation's water is doing transformative work. Both matter — but they must not be confused.

05

Weaponizing Privilege

Using settler access, credibility, and institutional reach to subvert colonial structures from within — in faith communities, workplaces, and financial institutions. Accomplices often do their most effective work in their own sphere, not in Indigenous community spaces.

06

From Ally to Accomplice

The Ally Industrial Complex — missionaries, saviors, co-opters, parachuters — builds social capital on others' struggles without sharing the risk. Accomplice-ship means shared risk, mutual consent, sustained accountability, and genuine deference to Indigenous leadership.

Step 2 · Build the Alternative

Three Pillars of Decolonial Praxis

Each pillar directly counters one component of the fused system. These are not discrete strategies — they are a single, indivisible praxis. A movement for LANDBACK cannot be sustained without mutual aid, and neither survives without dismantling the colonial enforcement apparatus.

Counter to Capitalism

Mutual Aid: The Logistics of Active Objection

Mutual Aid is defined by the principle of Solidarity, Not Charity. This distinction is foundational. Charity is hierarchical: "we" help "them," preserving the power differential. Mutual aid is horizontal and participatory: everyone comes together to solve problems we all face. It builds community infrastructure outside of and in opposition to exploitative markets.

Within the NewCO framework, mutual aid is described as "the logistics of Active Objection." The Economic Draft holds people in unjust systems by threatening survival. Mutual aid provides the material infrastructure — food, bail funds, childcare, legal defense — that makes withdrawal from those systems possible.

"You cannot ask a neighbor to desert the Economic Draft if the consequence is their family's starvation."

The critical failure mode for well-resourced faith communities is building parallel charity infrastructure that competes with existing community-led networks. The right move is to embed in, support, and follow the lead of networks already operating.

CONCRETE ACTIONS

Join existing, non-hierarchical mutual aid networks — don't start competing ones

Provide material "rations": gas cards, food, bail funds, legal support — without bureaucratic overhead or donor recognition

Understand mutual aid as a political act: building dual power and reducing state dependency

Support Des Moines Mutual Aid (DMMA) and GPAS mutual aid programming

Prioritize survival needs: food, housing, healthcare, legal defense, childcare over educational programming

Counter to Colonialism

LANDBACK & ReMatriation

LANDBACK begins with an unambiguous claim: decolonization is about returning land to Indigenous peoples. And it is not a metaphor. Land acknowledgments are a starting point at most — not an endpoint. Settler futurity — the assumption that the colonial state is permanent — is itself a colonial ideology.

GPAS founder Sikowis Nobiss (Plains Cree/Saulteaux) articulates a vision beyond LANDBACK: ReMatriation — "Returning the Sacred to the Mother." This holistic, Indigenous feminist framework calls for restoring reciprocal relationships between people and land, re-centering matriarchal principles of collective care and governance, and healing the ecological devastation caused by "unfettered patriarchal violence and greed."

"Settler futurity — the assumption the colonial state is permanent — is itself a colonial ideology. LANDBACK is not unrealistic. It is necessary."

CONCRETE ACTIONS

Pay a voluntary Land Tax to the Honor Native Land Fund as an ongoing act of accountability

Perform forensic title research on your meeting's land to identify specific treaty violations

Explore putting institutional land in trust for Indigenous stewardship

Divest from banks and investments that profit from fossil fuels or carceral systems

Support GPAS's ReMatriation Fund — funds land restoration, food sovereignty, cultural revitalization

Ask for explicit permission before holding gatherings or actions on traditional homelands

Counter to Colonial State

Abolition: Dismantling the Colonial Enforcement Arm

Abolition is a dual strategy: systematically divesting from the institutions of the carceral state — policing, prisons, surveillance — while simultaneously investing in community-based alternatives that create genuine safety.

The prison-industrial complex is the primary enforcement arm of the settler-colonial state — protecting property laws on stolen land and managing dispossessed populations. The school-to-prison pipeline is the direct successor to the logic of Indian Boarding Schools. A truly abolitionist future must be a decolonized future.

On electoral politics: The DRN framework includes a principled rejection of electoral politics as the primary vehicle for transformative change. Refusal to participate can be a conscious withdrawal of consent from a system fundamentally intertwined with capitalism and white supremacy. Electoralism diverts energy from more effective actions like building alternative institutions and mass direct action, creating an illusion of agency.

Evidence from CAHOOTS (Eugene, OR), STAR (Denver), and HEART (Oakland) shows that unarmed trained professionals can effectively handle the majority of 911 calls — reducing violence while saving resources.

CONCRETE ACTIONS

Support funding for community mental health crisis response as an alternative to armed police

Divest meeting/institutional funds from banks that profit from prison industries

Provide bail funds and legal support through existing abolitionist networks

Support Indigenous-led organizations challenging carceral expansion on traditional lands

Build dual-power institutions that demonstrate community can provide genuine safety

Step 3 · Follow the Example

Jeff Kisling & Sikowis Nobiss: A Replicable Model

The alliance between Iowa Quaker Jeff Kisling and Plains Cree/Saulteaux activist Sikowis Nobiss demonstrates what solidarity looks like when it moves from conviction to embodied, costly, accountable practice. Click each event to reveal the principle it demonstrates.

1969

Draft Refusal at Scattergood Friends School

Jeff Kisling turns 18 and refuses to register for the Vietnam War draft — not even as a conscientious objector doing alternative service, which he understood as a way to co-opt opposition while keeping you inside the system's logic. His mentor Don Laughlin had been imprisoned for the same witness.

Principle demonstrated: The NewCO framework's spiritual genealogy. Authentic moral witness requires accepting real cost and refusing the comfortable path that appears principled but keeps you inside the system. A community of conscience can support those who take such risks.
July 2017

The First Invitation — Iowa Yearly Meeting (Conservative)

Sikowis Nobiss speaks at the IYM(C) annual session, themed "Building Bridges." The first documented public meeting between Nobiss and this Quaker community. Jeff Kisling is present. For many Friends, this is the first time they have sat in direct, face-to-face engagement with an Indigenous leader who offers a full critique — including of Quakers specifically.

Principle demonstrated: Truth and Reckoning. The invitation required accepting that Nobiss would challenge the community's own tradition's complicity. Authentic relationship begins with willingness to hear what is uncomfortable — without controlling the narrative.
September 2018

94 Miles, One Tribe — First Nation-Farmer Climate Unity March

An eight-day, 94-mile march along the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) route through Iowa. Kisling and Nobiss, along with a mixed group of Native and non-Native activists, share the road, meals, stories, and hardship. The constant intimate conversation across cultural difference breaks down barriers no workshop could dissolve. Kisling documents the journey on firstnationfarmer.com. Fellow marcher Donnielle Wanatee: "We are a tribe."

Principle demonstrated: Embodied Trust. Solidarity that is not intellectual but physical, earned through shared effort and vulnerability. The trust forged here became the essential currency for all subsequent collaboration — including the act of institutional repair four years later.
2020–Present

Amplifying Indigenous Leadership — Truthsgiving, Fourth of He Lies, LANDBACK Friends

Kisling consistently attends and documents GPAS events — not as organizer or spokesperson, but as participant and chronicler. He uses his personal blog to amplify Nobiss's message to non-Native audiences, always crediting GPAS as the architects. He creates the LANDBACK Friends website at Nobiss's explicit request — not on his own initiative.

Principle demonstrated: Centering Indigenous Leadership. The website was created because an Indigenous leader asked for it. This is what deference looks like in practice — not passivity, but attentiveness to direction. "How can we support your work?" — then listen and follow.
2022

An Act of Institutional Repair — The Entire Budget

Following the discovery of unmarked graves at residential schools in Canada — including at the George Gordon First Nation, Nobiss's home community — Nobiss approaches the IYM(C) Peace & Social Concerns Committee. Due to "years of Friends' relationships with Sikowis Nobiss," the committee donates its entire annual budget — $1,100 — to support screenings of "They Found Us," a documentary about children's remains found at her First Nation's residential school.

Principle demonstrated: Moving from Words to Action. An institution whose ancestors helped run the boarding school system choosing to put its full resources behind the healing of the wounds it helped create. Not a statement. Not a working group. The full budget. Now. This act was possible only because of the years of relationship, trust, and honest reckoning that preceded it.
Step 4 · See the Vision

GPAS Urban Resilience & Innovation Hub

A 1.2-acre, Indigenous-led project in Iowa City — a living demonstration of Indigenous Futurism. Not a social service program, but a material act of world-building, with Traditional Ecological Knowledge at its heart. Iowa is the most biologically colonized state in the country. This hub is a direct response.

Biskaabiiyang (Returning to Ourselves): This Anishinaabemowin concept describes the process of identifying and shedding the psychological and emotional burdens of colonization in order to recover ancestral ways of being and knowing. The Hub is a physical space designed to facilitate this process — not backward-looking, but rooted in a living, forward-facing ancestral knowledge that is the most sophisticated science available for our 21st century crises.

🏛️

Hub Center

Main community space for education, training, mutual aid networking, and partnerships with Indigenous communities removed from the area.

🌿

Urban Farm

The heart of the hub. TEK-based food sovereignty education, land stewardship, and mutual aid through food production. Long-term vision: a community co-operative.

🌀

Healing Justice House

Dedicated space for a BIPOC Healing Collective addressing intergenerational trauma. Healing justice as a political strategy for collective liberation.

🚀

Launch Pads

Five incubator spaces for early-stage entrepreneurs developing ideas aligned with decolonial values and a regenerative economy.

Mutual Aid Café

Pay-what-you-can model, Indigenous coffee roaster partner, community fund, volunteer exchange, and social justice education — decolonial economics in everyday practice.

The Decolonial Repair Network

A Covenant for Accomplices

The DRN is a collective of non-Native individuals, communities, and organizations in Iowa and across the Midwest who strive to be good accomplices to Indigenous people through actively working to repair the harms of colonization. Open to anyone across the country.

Who We Are

The DRN acknowledges that the dominant white culture bears the primary responsibility for colonial harm and that white people bear a particular responsibility to repair it — while welcoming non-Native People of Color and committing to listen to Indigenous leadership. The work of repair heals not only Indigenous peoples and land, but settlers ourselves.

Honor Native Land Fund (HNLF)

The DRN's primary mechanism for material accountability — a voluntary Land Tax through which non-Native settlers contribute ongoing financial support to GPAS's ReMatriation Fund. A community that makes a financial commitment — ongoing, automatic — has moved from good intentions to active objection.

Monthly calls: First Wednesday · 7–8 PM CT · decolonialrepairnetwork.blog

Quaker Testimonies as Decolonial Compass

The SPICES testimonies contain powerful, if sometimes latent, resources for decolonial work. The call is not to add decolonization onto existing practices — but to ask whether the testimonies are being authentically lived, and to let honest answers generate movement.

S

Simplicity — Release from extractive consumption and accumulation

P

Peace — Cannot be held authentically while occupying land seized through genocidal violence

I

Integrity — Requires honest reckoning with the gap between what we profess and what we do

E

Equality — "That of God in every person" stands in direct opposition to dehumanization

For Individual & Corporate Discernment

Queries for an Evolving Praxis

In the Quaker tradition, queries are questions held in community for discernment — not to be answered quickly, but held with honesty. Click each category to open the queries.

On Complicity & Reckoning
QWhat is the specific history of Indigenous dispossession on the land my meeting occupies? Whose land is this, and what treaties were broken in its acquisition?
QHow did my institution come to acquire its property? How is that history present in our current wealth and security?
QHave I fully reckoned with the Quaker role in Indian Boarding Schools — not as abstract historical fact, but as institutional harm my community participated in?
QWhere am I still "cooperating with the system" in ways that constitute the moral equivalent of registering as a conscientious objector — appearing to object while remaining inside the system's logic?
On Relationship & Centering
QDo I have real, personal relationships with Indigenous people in my community? If not, why not — and what am I doing to change that?
QWhen I act in solidarity with Indigenous communities, am I following their direction, or setting my own agenda?
QHave I asked permission before acting on or through Indigenous lands or in Indigenous cultural contexts?
QIs my solidarity relationship useful to the Indigenous partner organization? How do I know?
On Material Commitment
QAm I contributing financially to the Honor Native Land Fund or an equivalent voluntary land tax? If not, what prevents me?
QWhat banks, investment vehicles, and institutional relationships benefit from colonial extraction? What steps am I taking to divest from them?
QIs our meeting's land available to be put in trust for Indigenous stewardship? Have we explored this?
QAm I confusing changed language or organizational statements for changed conditions?
On Collective Discernment & Action
QIs our meeting using discernment as a genuine spiritual tool — or as a way to slow-walk material commitments until the urgency passes?
QAre we building mutual aid networks that reduce community dependency on extractive systems — or charity programs that supplement that dependency?
QHow do we avoid replicating colonial structures — hierarchy, urgency, extraction — within our own organizing?
QHow do we distinguish between prefigurative work (living differently) and transformative work (changing the conditions others live under)?
The Ongoing Question: Will We Change?
Q"Most people I know have tended to choose the more comfortable path when faced with such moral challenges." — Jeff Kisling. Where is the comfortable path showing up in my own life and meeting?
QWhat would it mean for our meeting to apply the same courage of conscientious objection to war — to the systems of colonial capitalism operating today?
QAre we willing to accept real cost — financial, relational, reputational — in service of Indigenous liberation? Or are we seeking a solidarity that is costless?
Step 5 · Make the Commitments

DRN Core Commitments

Members of the Decolonial Repair Network commit to ongoing, holistic action — not a one-time event, but a continuing practice across all dimensions of life.

💰

Financial

Ongoing contributions to the Honor Native Land Fund → GPAS ReMatriation Fund. A voluntary land tax that moves solidarity from testimonial to material.

📚

Educational

Monthly learning calls, first Wednesday, 7–8 PM CT — focused on Indigenous and colonial history, current issues, and guest speakers (both Native and non-Native).

Political

Confronting racism in all its forms — mascots, cultural appropriation, legal and cultural systems of white supremacy — wherever we encounter them.

🌀

Personal & Spiritual

Inner transformation and healing the wounds of colonialism within ourselves — understanding that the work of repair includes our own healing.

🌱

Ecological

Healing land in whatever places we inhabit — participating in land restoration, supporting TEK-based stewardship, and reducing extractive practices.

🤝

Solidarity in Action

Showing up — physically, financially, publicly — when Indigenous leaders call for solidarity and support. Being present through the long, unglamorous work.

"The standard is their liberation, not our comfort."
— Decolonial Repair Network
"Let our lives speak."
— Quaker saying